Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2017-03-11 08:53:44
Size: 2231
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2017-03-11 08:55:40
Size: 2316
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 32: Line 32:

Apogee insertion motors and "pad" ops will cost much more than the launch energy.

Launch Loop Stats

2017 March 10

5700 km

length of rotor

100 km

launch path altitude

14 km/s

rotor speed at altitude

3 kg/m

rotor density at altitude

14.069 km/s

rotor speed at surface

2.985 kg/m

rotor density at surface

17e6 kg

rotor mass

$6/kg

estimated cost of electrical steel

$100M

cost of rotor electrical steel

1.7e15 J

rotor kinetic energy

460 GWh

rotor kinetic energy

≈ 5.6 days

energy use in Portland, Oregon

300 MW

"maintenance" power and losses

2600 GWh

annual maintenance energy

98%

incremental launch energy efficiency

10.5 km/s

launch velocity to GTO

56 GJ

launch energy per tonne to GTO

$50/MWHr

WAG estimate, electricity cost

$800/tonne

electricity cost per tonne to GTO

400 tonnes/hr

maximum launch rate

3.5e6 tonnes/year

maximum launch rate

6.5 GW

power needed for maximum launch rate

Saturn V rocket

3e6 kg

launch mass

50 tonnes

est payload to GTO

A launch loop rotor weighing as much as 6 Saturn V rockets can launch as much as those six rockets in 45 minutes. Of course, launch loop static mass is much larger, including power plants, floats and anchoring cables, turn around magnets, sheathing, etc., but that in turn is much smaller than the construction and power plant mass of Kennedy Space Center.

Apogee insertion motors and "pad" ops will cost much more than the launch energy.

Stats (last edited 2017-03-11 23:58:06 by KeithLofstrom)